On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 08:10:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> "clock-latency" is incorrectly written as "transition-latency" in an example
> present in Documentation of cpufreq-cpu0. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Am I supposed to take this?
Rafael
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> index 4416ccc..051f764 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ cpus {
> 396000 950000
> 198000 850000
> >;
> - transition-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> };
>
> cpu@1 {
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
