On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > We have this kind of stuff all over the place. If we allocate > some small amount of memory and and need some small amount > associated with this memory, there is no problem with a little > waste. Little? How about quarter of kilobyte per inode? sizeof(struct inode) is nearly half-kilobyte. And icache can easily get to ~100000 elements. > Waste is better than fragmentation. This is the lesson people > learned from segments in the ia32. > > Objects are easier to manage, if they are the same size. So don't keep them in the same cache. Notice that quite a few systems keep vnode separately from fs-specific data. For a very good reason. Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David L. Parsley
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoint... Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Richard Gooch
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Richard Gooch
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Richard Gooch
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Rik van Riel
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Jan Harkes
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bi... David Woodhouse