On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:37:55AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:41:30AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >> On 3/21/2013 10:18 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> >  o       Use the "idle=poll" boot parameter.  However, please note
> >> >          that use of this parameter can cause your CPU to overheat,
> >> >          which may cause thermal throttling to degrade your
> >> >          latencies --and that this degradation can be even worse
> >> >          than that of dyntick-idle.
> >> 
> >> it also disables (effectively) Turbo Mode on Intel cpus... which can
> >> cost you a serious percentage of performance
> >
> > Thank you, added!  Please see below for the updated list.
> >
> >                                                     Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > o   Dyntick-idle slows transitions to and from idle slightly.
> >     In practice, this has not been a problem except for the most
> >     aggressive real-time workloads, which have the option of disabling
> >     dyntick-idle mode, an option that most of them take.  However,
> >     some workloads will no doubt want to use adaptive ticks to
> >     eliminate scheduling-clock-tick latencies.  Here are some
> >     options for these workloads:
> >
> >     a.      Use PMQOS from userspace to inform the kernel of your
> >             latency requirements (preferred).
> 
> This is not only the preferred approach, but the *only* approach
> available on non-x86 systems.  Perhaps the others should be marked as
> x86-only?

Good point, added that.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> Kevin
> 
> >     b.      Use the "idle=mwait" boot parameter.
> >
> >     c.      Use the "intel_idle.max_cstate=" to limit the maximum
> >             depth C-state depth.
> >
> >     d.      Use the "idle=poll" boot parameter.  However, please note
> >             that use of this parameter can cause your CPU to overheat,
> >             which may cause thermal throttling to degrade your
> >             latencies -- and that this degradation can be even worse
> >             than that of dyntick-idle.  Furthermore, this parameter
> >             effectively disables Turbo Mode on Intel CPUs, which
> >             can significantly reduce maximum performance.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to