On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Mack <dan...@zonque.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 03/20/2013 09:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> The same data is now available in sysfs, so we can remove the code >>> that exports it in /proc and replace it with a symlink to the sysfs >>> version. >>> >>> Tested on versatile qemu model and mpc5200 eval board. More testing >>> would be appreciated. >> >> I would suggest testing with lshw in particular. That's the only >> /proc/device-tree user I've come across. > > kexec is another one. Not to mention various vendor scripts that aren't > necessarily public. > > Don't such things also fall under the "we do not break userspace > compatibility - ever" rule?
Correct. I've got no intention of applying this without testing the major users first. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
