On 03/18/2013 09:47 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> This patch introduces CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL.
>
> I'd like to see this named CAP_MODIFY_KERNEL, which is more accurate and
> less emotive. Otherwise I think core kernel developers will be scratching
> their head over where to sprinkle this.
>
> Apart from that, I like the idea, especially when it's wired up to MAC
> security.
The wiring up to MAC security is a nice touch.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
