Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?

[Eric S. Raymond]

Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Even supposing that's so, a 36% rate of broken symbols is way too high. 
> > It argues that we need to do a thorough housecleaning at least once in
> > order to get back to an acceptably low stable rate.
> 
> Many of your 'broken' symbols arent. We have no idea what the real amount is

If it can't be mechanically verified that the symbol has a correct reference 
pattern within the tree, then it's broken.  That's a definition.

The fact that it might become un-broken someday, by somebody's
intention to merge in future code, is interesting but irrelevant to
the fact that symbols broken in present time *mask bugs* in present time.

I'm not being a compulsive neatnik -- that wouldn't be worth my time.  What I'm
trying to do is reduce the number of crevices in which bugs can hide.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were
no religion in it.
        -- John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/