On 2013/3/15 8:20, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-03-14四的 15:43 +0100，Oleg Nesterov写道：
>> On 03/14, liguang wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/task_work.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
>>> index 0bf4258..f458b08 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/task_work.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/task_work.c
>>> @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ void task_work_run(void)
>>>
>>> do {
>>> next = work->next;
>>> - work->func(work);
>>> + if (unlikely(work->func))
>>> + work->func(work);
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Oleg.
>>
>
> can we believe a callback always be call-able?
> can it happened to be 0? e.g. wrong initialized.
> of course, we can complain the caller, be why don't
> we easily make it more safer?
>
Because you're not making things safer, but your're trying
to cover up bugs...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
