Hey, Lai. On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > This patchset contains the following 31 patches. > > > > 0001-workqueue-make-sanity-checks-less-punshing-using-WAR.patch > > > 0002-workqueue-make-workqueue_lock-irq-safe.patch > > workqueue_lock protects too many things. We can introduce different locks > for different purpose later.
I don't know. My general attitude toward locking is the simpler the better. None of the paths protected by workqueue_lock are hot. There's no actual benefit in making them finer grained. > > 0023-workqueue-implement-get-put_pwq.patch > > I guess this patch and patch25 may have very deep issue VS RCU. Hmmm... scary. I suppose you're gonna elaborate on the review of the actual patch? > > 0024-workqueue-prepare-flush_workqueue-for-dynamic-creati.patch > > 0025-workqueue-perform-non-reentrancy-test-when-queueing-.patch > > 0026-workqueue-implement-apply_workqueue_attrs.patch > > 0027-workqueue-make-it-clear-that-WQ_DRAINING-is-an-inter.patch > > 0028-workqueue-reject-increasing-max_active-for-ordered-w.patch > > 0029-cpumask-implement-cpumask_parse.patch > > 0030-driver-base-implement-subsys_virtual_register.patch > > 0031-workqueue-implement-sysfs-interface-for-workqueues.patch > > > for 1~13,15~22,26~28, please add Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan > <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> Done. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
