Jesse S Sipprell writes: > On error, -1 is returned in the usual fashion and offset is purported to be > updated to point to the next byte following the last one sent. > > Will the zerocopy patches break this? No, they should not. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP an... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TC... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfile() Alan Cox
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfi... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and se... Alan Cox
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP an... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TC... Pekka Pietikainen
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TC... Jesse S Sipprell
- Re: Possible problem with zero-co... David S. Miller
- Re: Possible problem with zer... Jesse S Sipprell
- Re: Possible problem with zer... David S. Miller
- Re: Possible problem with zero-co... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zer... Wolfgang Rohdewald
- Re: Possible problem with zer... Martin Josefsson
- Re: Possible problem with zer... Jan Kasprzak