On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > Some more progress: I now downgraded to proftpd without sendfile(). > The CPU usage is now nearly 100% (with ~170 FTP users; with sendfile() > it was under 50% with >320 FTP users). But nevertheless, the downloaded > images now seem to be OK. > > Should I try the stock 2.4.3 without zero-copy patches? It might also be useful to try 2.4.3+zc with the dev->features |= NETIF_F_SG; in the 3c59x driver taken out (so it won't use zero-copy) Since it starts from the beginning instead of corrupting random packets I doubt it's a hardware problem, though. -- Pekka Pietikainen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfile() Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfi... Andi Kleen
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and se... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP an... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TC... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfi... Alan Cox
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and se... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP an... Alan Cox
- Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TC... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with zero-co... Pekka Pietikainen
- Re: Possible problem with zero-co... Jesse S Sipprell
- Re: Possible problem with zer... David S. Miller
- Re: Possible problem with... Jesse S Sipprell
- Re: Possible problem with... David S. Miller
- Re: Possible problem with zer... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Possible problem with... Wolfgang Rohdewald
- Re: Possible problem with... Martin Josefsson
- Re: Possible problem with... Jan Kasprzak