* Theodore Ts'o: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:25:55PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Its a simple argument, MS can revoke our keys for whatever reason, >> reducing the surface area of reasons for them to do so seems like a >> good idea. Unless someone can read the mind of the MS guy that >> arbitrarily decides this in 5 years time, or has some sort of signed >> agreement, I tend towards protecting the users from having their Linux >> not work anymore, because we were scared of a PE loader in the kernel. > > If Microsoft will revoke keys for whatever reason they want, without > any regard to the potential PR and legal consequences to Microsoft, > there's absolutely **nothing** you can do, short of choosing to use > more open hardware (for example, like the Chromebook Pixel).
| No, there's no way to set the legacy boot as the default option. <https://plus.google.com/100479847213284361344/posts/QhmBpn5GNE9> So non-interactive booting of alternative operating systems is *not* supported. This is way more restrictive than any x86 UEFI device I've heard of (even in the face of a potential revocation of the boot loader by Microsoft). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
