On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:25:55PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> > >> Right. We've failed at creating an alternative. That doesn't mean that > >> we get to skip the responsibilities associated with the choice we've > >> made. > > > > Wait, who is "we" here? The community? The community over-all didn't > > agree with anything with Microsoft, that is between the people getting a > > signed key and Microsoft. Again, you are trying to push your (prior) > > company's agreement between them and Microsoft onto the community, and > > now the community is pushing back, is that a surprise? > > Do you not work for the LF?, Matthew doesn't work for RH, so please > leave the petty my employer said this, and he's better than your > employer and try and stick to technical details.
No, sorry, I'm not trying to say that at all (and my LF employment agreement is quite weird, I don't speak for them at all, and they can't tell me what to do, and everyone is happy.) I am trying to say that the "we" here is NOT the community. The community does not have any "responsibility" to Microsoft or any corporate. Our only responsibility is to our users, as Linus stated. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
