* Matthew Garrett: > I don't think that's a problem. Just put the original binary hash in the > certificate before signing it, and extend the X.509 parser to refuse > certificates that have a tag that's present in dbx.
Why would Microsoft put a hash of something into dbx which they haven't signed? Wouldn't this make them subject to a denial-of-service attack on their platform if they revoke something with surprising consequences? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
