On 02/20/2013 11:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:33 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >>> You don't actually compute the rq utilization, you only compute the >>> utilization as per the fair class, so if there's significant RT >> activity >>> it'll think the cpu is under-utilized, whihc I think will result in >> the >>> wrong thing. >> >> yes. A bit complicit to resolve this. Any suggestions on this, guys? > > Shouldn't be too hard seeing as we already track cpu utilization for ! > fair usage; see rq::rt_avg and scale_rt_power. >
added them in periodic balancing, thanks! -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
