From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com>

Support virtio configuration space and device status. The virtio
device can now access the resource table in shared memory.

Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c   |    3 --
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/linux/remoteproc.h             |    4 --
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 6466f39..93529e3 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -349,9 +349,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct 
fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
                        goto free_rvdev;
        }
 
-       /* remember the device features */
-       rvdev->dfeatures = rsc->dfeatures;
-
        /* remember the resource offset*/
        rvdev->rsc_offset = offset;
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index 9e198e5..b32bf1f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -173,25 +173,29 @@ error:
        return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * We don't support yet real virtio status semantics.
- *
- * The plan is to provide this via the VDEV resource entry
- * which is part of the firmware: this way the remote processor
- * will be able to access the status values as set by us.
- */
 static u8 rproc_virtio_get_status(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
-       return 0;
+       struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
+
+       return rsc->status;
 }
 
 static void rproc_virtio_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
 {
+       struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
+
+       rsc->status = status;
        dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "status: %d\n", status);
 }
 
 static void rproc_virtio_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
+       struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
+
+       rsc->status = 0;
        dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "reset !\n");
 }
 
@@ -199,13 +203,15 @@ static void rproc_virtio_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 static u32 rproc_virtio_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
        struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
 
-       return rvdev->dfeatures;
+       return rsc->dfeatures;
 }
 
 static void rproc_virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
        struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
 
        /* Give virtio_ring a chance to accept features */
        vring_transport_features(vdev);
@@ -213,13 +219,36 @@ static void rproc_virtio_finalize_features(struct 
virtio_device *vdev)
        /*
         * Remember the finalized features of our vdev, and provide it
         * to the remote processor once it is powered on.
-        *
-        * Similarly to the status field, we don't expose yet the negotiated
-        * features to the remote processors at this point. This will be
-        * fixed as part of a small resource table overhaul and then an
-        * extension of the virtio resource entries.
         */
-       rvdev->gfeatures = vdev->features[0];
+       rsc->gfeatures = vdev->features[0];
+}
+
+static void rproc_virtio_get(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
+                                                       void *buf, unsigned len)
+{
+       struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
+       void *cfg = &rsc->vring[rsc->num_of_vrings];
+
+       if (offset + len > rsc->config_len || offset + len < len)
+               dev_err(&vdev->dev,
+                       "rproc_virtio_get: access out of bounds\n");
+       else
+               memcpy(buf, cfg + offset, len);
+}
+
+static void rproc_virtio_set(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
+                     const void *buf, unsigned len)
+{
+       struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
+       struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->rsc + rvdev->rsc_offset;
+       void *cfg = &rsc->vring[rsc->num_of_vrings];
+
+       if (offset + len > rsc->config_len || offset + len < len)
+               dev_err(&vdev->dev,
+                       "rproc_virtio_set: access out of bounds\n");
+       else
+               memcpy(cfg + offset, buf, len);
 }
 
 static struct virtio_config_ops rproc_virtio_config_ops = {
@@ -230,6 +259,8 @@ static struct virtio_config_ops rproc_virtio_config_ops = {
        .reset          = rproc_virtio_reset,
        .set_status     = rproc_virtio_set_status,
        .get_status     = rproc_virtio_get_status,
+       .get            = rproc_virtio_get,
+       .set            = rproc_virtio_set,
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 272f088..ca1c1b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -469,8 +469,6 @@ struct rproc_vring {
  * @rproc: the rproc handle
  * @vdev: the virio device
  * @vring: the vrings for this vdev
- * @dfeatures: virtio device features
- * @gfeatures: virtio guest features
  * @rsc_offset: offset of the vdev's resource entry
  */
 struct rproc_vdev {
@@ -478,8 +476,6 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
        struct rproc *rproc;
        struct virtio_device vdev;
        struct rproc_vring vring[RVDEV_NUM_VRINGS];
-       unsigned long dfeatures;
-       unsigned long gfeatures;
        u32 rsc_offset;
 };
 
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to