On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Hmm... I clearly jumped the gun, assuming consensus was already reached. > I have put these patches *back* into pending-rebases, and they will not > be merged this merge window.
Thanks. What do you think about creating some virtio-level wrappers for the vringh handlers? I don't think we're going to stop with caif as the only vringh user, and it could be nice if we follow the virtio spirit of decoupling the drivers from the low level implementation. It sure did prove itself when the remoteproc use cases started showing up, and it's neat. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
