On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:24:39AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> +
> +                     code = keycodes[pos];
> +                     new_state = kb_state[col] & (1 << row);
> +                     if (!!new_state != test_bit(code, idev->key)) {
> +                             dev_dbg(ckdev->dev,
> +                                     "changed: [r%d c%d]: byte %02x\n",
> +                                     row, col, new_state);
> +
> +                     input_report_key(idev, code, new_state);

Incorrect indentation.


> +                     }

...

> +static int cros_ec_keyb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +     struct device *dev = ec->dev;
> +     struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev = NULL;
> +     struct input_dev *idev = NULL;

Why are we assigning these to NULL?

Otherwise

Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com>

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to