On 20 February 2013 18:06, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Alexander Shiyan wrote: >> On 20 February 2013 13:41, Alexander Shiyan <shc_w...@mail.ru> wrote: >> > >> > One problem is that every user needs to add their syscon compatible device >> > support(platform_device_id) in syscon driver first before they can use it. >> > But it looks to me just like how other driver generally does. >> >> I agree, this is a more proper way, but in this case we should create a big >> table >> here with records for each device... >> >> > Arnd, >> > Do you think this is an issue? > > I would first like to get an answer to the question I asked in my first mail, > which is what the use case of non-DT support in this driver is. If this > is used only by a new platform that has to use DT anyway, or by an existing > platform that is easy enough to convert, we probably shouldn't do all this > at all. >
If the platform can convert to dt, then we do not have such issue. The question is do we allow the existing non-dt platforms to use it before converting? Regards Dong Aisheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
