Hi
Regarding the patch ....
I don't have experience with the linux kernel internals but could this patch
not lead to a run-loop condition as the only thing that can break our of the
for(;;) loop is the tmp==&dentry_unused statement. So if the required number
of dentries does not exist and this condition is not satisfied we would have
an infinate loop... sorry if this is a silly question.
Also the comment >/* If the dentry was recently referenced, don't free it.
*/<, the code inside is excuted if the DCACHE_REFERENCED flags are set and in
the code is is reversing the DCACHE_REFERENCED flag on the dentry and adding
it to the dentry_unsed list??? So a Refrenched entry is set Not Referenced
and place in the unsed list?? I am unclear about that... is the comment
correct or is my understanding lacking (which is very probable :-))..
TIA
MarCin
FYI >--------
void prune_dcache(int count)
{
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
for (;;) {
struct dentry *dentry;
struct list_head *tmp;
tmp = dentry_unused.prev;
if (tmp == &dentry_unused)
break;
list_del_init(tmp);
dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
/* If the dentry was recently referenced, don't free it. */
if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
continue;
}
dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
/* Unused dentry with a count? */
if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count))
BUG();
prune_one_dentry(dentry);
if (!--count)
break;
}
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}
-----------------------------
Marcin Kowalski
Linux/Perl Developer
Datrix Solutions
Cel. 082-400-7603
***Open Source Kicks Ass***
-----------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
