On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:33:02 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andr...@gaisler.com> wrote:
> The swap to convert LE to BE in bgpio_pin2mask_be should be on byte level, not
> on bit level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andr...@gaisler.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
> index 05fcc0f..7f11537 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,10 @@ static unsigned long bgpio_pin2mask(struct bgpio_chip
> *bgc, unsigned int pin)
> static unsigned long bgpio_pin2mask_be(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
> unsigned int pin)
> {
> - return 1 << (bgc->bits - 1 - pin);
> + unsigned int bit = pin & 0x7; /* Bit number within byte */
> + unsigned int base = pin - bit; /* Pin that is bit 0 within byte */
> +
> + return 1 << ((bgc->bits - base - 8) + bit); /* shifted base + bit */
Ah, sorry for my previous reply. I see you have seen gpio-generic. :-)
No, the original calculation is correct. BE and LE bit numbering are
opposite, bit Linux always uses LE numbers as far as bit masks are
concerned. Therefore pin 0 is the most significant bit, and
pin (nr_bits-1) is the least significant bit.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
