On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:10:31AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hey, > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 07:15:58PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:02:41PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 05:20:01PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > * Bruce, I couldn't convert nfsd. Can you please help? More on it > > > > later. > > > ... > > > > I converted all in-kernel users except nfsd and staging drivers. nfsd > > > > splits preloading and actual id allocation in a way that per-cpu > > > > preloading can't be used. I couldn't follow the control flow to > > > > verify whether the current code is correct either. I think the best > > > > way would be allocating ID upfront without installing the handle and > > > > then later using idr_replace() to install the pointer when the ID > > > > actually gets used. Bruce, would something like that be possible? > > > > > > Actually, I'm not even sure if that's necessary, we can probably just > > > do it all at the start. > > > > > > I'll try to have a patch doing that tomorrow. > > > > So, something like this. > > Yeah, that should be easily convertable to the new interface. How > should we route these changes? Your patch can go through the usual > nfs channel and the conversion and deprecation patches can be held off > until after -rc1. Does that sound okay?
Whatever's easiest for you. That sounds fine to me. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
