2013/2/2 anish kumar <anish198519851...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> 2012/11/3 anish kumar <anish198519851...@gmail.com>: >> > From: anish kumar <anish198519851...@gmail.com> >> > >> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function >> > it is better to just make it void. >> > >> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> >> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851...@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > kernel/irq_work.c | 5 ++--- >> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c >> > index 1588e3b..4829a31 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/irq_work.c >> > +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c >> > @@ -79,17 +79,16 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work) >> > * >> > * Can be re-enqueued while the callback is still in progress. >> > */ >> > -bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work) >> > +void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work) >> >> Please also update the headers in include/linux/irq_work.h accordingly. > I have sent the patch again(some time back).Is it picked up? > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1667796
Yep, I'm applying it and if it passes basic tests I'll relay it to Ingo. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
