From: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
Currently in the empty abx500_pin_config_get() function, we're
returning -EINVAL, with a comment stating that the reason for the
failure is that the function isn't implemented yet. Well there's
a proper return code for that. If we use it, we can do away with
the comment too, as it would be implied.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c
index 539c9bb..305a9cb 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c
@@ -971,8 +971,7 @@ int abx500_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
unsigned pin,
unsigned long *config)
{
- /* Not implemented */
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
int abx500_pin_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
--
1.7.11.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
