On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com> wrote:
> +static int remove_all_stable_nodes(void)
> +{
> + struct stable_node *stable_node;
> + int nid;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> + while (root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node) {
> + stable_node = rb_entry(root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node,
> + struct stable_node, node);
> + if (remove_stable_node(stable_node)) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
It's a bit rude to overwrite remove_stable_node()'s return value.
> + break; /* proceed to next nid */
> + }
> + cond_resched();
Why is this here?
> + }
> + }
> + return err;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
