On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 17:49:13, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On 1/10/2013 1:07 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 18:17:46, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>
> > I do not think that it is good idea to move NAND pin mux information
> > into da850.dtsi because this information is evm specific.
> > if we will use this approach then we must use the same approach for
> > other modules also as ASoC etc.
>
> Why do you consider this EVM specific. IOW, which pins do you see
> changing on another board? BTW, if there are additional pins needed than
> what are listed, we can always add more pinux entries in the .dts files.
> The pins present in dtsi file should the base case.
Ok, we can use this approach for DaVinci as its SoC modules do not
have multiple pin configuration option. I will do the changes in
next patch series.
Thanks,
Anil
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
