3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

[ Upstream commit e371589917011efe6ff8c7dfb4e9e81934ac5855 ]

Followup of commit 0c24604b68fc (tcp: implement RFC 5961 4.2)

As reported by Vijay Subramanian, we should send a challenge ACK
instead of a dup ack if a SYN flag is set on a packet received out of
window.

This permits the ratelimiting to work as intended, and to increase
correct SNMP counters.

Suggested-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vi...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Acked-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vi...@gmail.com>
Cc: Kiran Kumar Kella <kki...@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -5214,8 +5214,11 @@ static bool tcp_validate_incoming(struct
                 * an acknowledgment should be sent in reply (unless the RST
                 * bit is set, if so drop the segment and return)".
                 */
-               if (!th->rst)
+               if (!th->rst) {
+                       if (th->syn)
+                               goto syn_challenge;
                        tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
+               }
                goto discard;
        }
 
@@ -5245,6 +5248,7 @@ static bool tcp_validate_incoming(struct
         * RFC 5691 4.2 : Send a challenge ack
         */
        if (th->syn) {
+syn_challenge:
                if (syn_inerr)
                        TCP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS);
                NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPSYNCHALLENGE);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to