From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

                   -------------------
    This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release.
    http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/paulg/longterm-queue-2.6.34.git
    If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.
                   -------------------

commit d123375425d7df4b6081a631fc1203fceafa59b2 upstream.

Peter Zijlstra pointed out, that the only user of asmregparm (x86) is
compiling the kernel already with -mregparm=3. So the annotation of
the rwsem functions is redundant. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <let...@linux-sh.org>
Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: Chris Zankel <ch...@zankel.net>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101262130450.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
[PG: fixes compile errors when using newer gcc on 2.6.34 baseline]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 12 ++++--------
 lib/rwsem.c                  | 10 ++++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 606ede1..c46685c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -45,14 +45,10 @@
 
 struct rwsem_waiter;
 
-extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
- rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
- rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
- rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *);
-extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
- rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 
 /*
  * the semaphore definition
diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
index ceba8e2..a112c06 100644
--- a/lib/rwsem.c
+++ b/lib/rwsem.c
@@ -188,8 +188,7 @@ rwsem_down_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
 /*
  * wait for the read lock to be granted
  */
-asmregparm struct rw_semaphore __sched *
-rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
        struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 
@@ -202,8 +201,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 /*
  * wait for the write lock to be granted
  */
-asmregparm struct rw_semaphore __sched *
-rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
        struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 
@@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
  * handle waking up a waiter on the semaphore
  * - up_read/up_write has decremented the active part of count if we come here
  */
-asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -237,7 +235,7 @@ asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct 
rw_semaphore *sem)
  * - caller incremented waiting part of count and discovered it still negative
  * - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue
  */
-asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.7.12.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to