On 01/03/2013 06:18 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming <matt.flem...@intel.com> >
snip > /* > - * We play games with efi_enabled so that the compiler will, if possible, > remove > - * EFI-related code altogether. > + * We play games with efi_enabled so that the compiler will, if > + * possible, remove EFI-related code altogether. > */ > +#define EFI_BOOT 0x00000001 /* Were we booted from EFI? */ > +#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLES 0x00000002 /* Can we use EFI system tables? */ > +#define EFI_CONFIG_TABLES 0x00000004 /* Can we use EFI config tables? */ > +#define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES 0x00000004 /* Can we use runtime services? */ > +#define EFI_MEMMAP 0x00000008 /* Can we use EFI memory map? */ > +#define EFI_64BIT 0x00000010 /* Is the firmware 64-bit? */ > + Your use of test_bit() and set_bit() imply that these macros should be bit numbers, not bit masks. It'll work until you define a mask with an integer value greater then 31. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
