Revising my position: v4 will only have comments update (Ben) and new cpu_rmap_get inetrnal helper (Josh). IMHO, further API rework discussed with Ben and Eric ought to be in a later patch, as they affect drivers.
-- David Decotigny On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM, David Decotigny <de...@googlers.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > I appreciate your review and clarification, as I was afraid there > could be something I missed. I will send v4 of this patch: an update > with the cpu_rmap_get helper that Josh suggested and the > "free_cpu_rmap" alias removed. > > Regards, > > -- > David Decotigny > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ben Hutchings > <bhutchi...@solarflare.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 12:36 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:57:09AM -0800, David Decotigny wrote: >>> > In some cases, free_irq_cpu_rmap() is called while holding a lock >>> > (eg. rtnl). This can lead to deadlocks, because it invokes >>> > flush_scheduled_work() which ends up waiting for whole system >>> > workqueue to flush, but some pending works might try to acquire the >>> > lock we are already holding. >>> > >>> > This commit uses reference-counting to replace >>> > irq_run_affinity_notifiers(). It also removes >>> > irq_run_affinity_notifiers() altogether. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: David Decotigny <de...@googlers.com> >>> >>> You might consider adding a cpu_rmap_get to parallel cpu_rmap_put. >>> >>> Also, why keep free_cpu_rmap around at this point? As far as I can >>> tell, it has no callers. >>> >>> Otherwise, this looks good to me. >> >> I intended to make cpu_rmap usable independently of IRQ notification, >> although as you note there have been no other users so far. >> free_cpu_rmap() is now effectively an alias for cpu_rmap_put(), and the >> latter *does* have a caller. So perhaps cpu_rmap_put() should be extern >> and the alias dropped. >> >> Ben. >> >> -- >> Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare >> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. >> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/