On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:04:35PM +0400, Vasily Kulikov wrote:

> > I'm sorry, but this is not a solution.  Kernel is not x86-only; there are
> > architectures with far bigger minimal stack frame size.  E.g. on sparc64
> > every fucking stack frame is at least 176 bytes.  So your 100 calls deep
> > call chain will happily overflow the damn stack all by itself - kernel
> > stack on sparc64 is 16Kb total, including struct thread_info living there.
> 
> Understood.  How to properly fix it then?  Looks like there are quite
> many kernel structures which may reference other structures which
> indirectly reference each other via kref, IOW it is not user_ns specific
> issue.  With unprivileged user_ns the way it should be freed must be
> somehow changed.

        There are many damn good reasons why kref should *not* be used without
thinking.  It's been oversold as easy solution to all refcounting problems;
it isn't one.  Don't use it here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to