>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matthew> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:47:13AM -0700, Andreas Dilger Matthew> wrote: >> What do you mean by problems 5 years down the road? The real issue >> is that this 32-bit block count limit affects composite devices >> like MD RAID and LVM today, not just individual disks. There have >> been several postings I have seen with people having a problem >> _today_ with a 2TB limit on devices. Matthew> people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit Matthew> processor. Oh great, and migrating a large application to a new architecture is soo cheap. Disk costs nothing these days and there is a legitimate need here. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Andreas Dilger
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit system... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit s... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit system... Rik van Riel
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit system... Jes Sorensen
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Dan Hollis

