On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c, in submit_bh() > > bh->b_rsector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9); > > But it shouldn't cause data corruptions: > It was discussed a few months ago, and iirc LVM refuses to create too > large volumes. Ah yes, I'd forgotten the block layer still works in terms of 512-byte blocks. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Andreas Dilger
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit system... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Rik van Riel
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jes Sorensen
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Dan Hollis
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jonathan Morton
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jan Harkes