"Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@hallyn.com> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com):
>> A child user namespace having capabilities against processes in it's
>> parent seems totally bizarre and pretty dangerous from a capabilities
>> standpoint.
>
> How would it have them against its parent?
init_user_ns
userns a --- created by kuid 1
userns b -- created by kuid 2
process c in userns b with kuid 1
Serge read the first permisison check in common_cap.
Think what happens in the above example.
For the rest I understand your concern.
Serge please read and look at the patches I have posted to fix
the issues Andy found with the user namespace tree. Especially
the fix to commit_creds.
After you have looked at the patches to fix the issues I will
be happy to discuss things further with you.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
