On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > ??? > <checking 2.2.0> > Nope, no calls into ext2/*. do_revalidate() seeing NULL ->i_revalidate > and doing nothing, lnamei() doing usual lookup, cp_old_stat() not touching > fs code at all... the problem was that it was calling lock_kernel(), not the lowlevel fs i believe - this caused contention. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Anton Blanchard
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Andreas Dilger
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... Andreas Dilger
- [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [was: spinl... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Anton Blanchard
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability p... Alexander Viro
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_bloc... Ingo Molnar
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Linus Torvalds
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Alexander Viro
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... James Lewis Nance
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lr... Alexander Viro