On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> ???
> <checking 2.2.0>
> Nope, no calls into ext2/*. do_revalidate() seeing NULL ->i_revalidate
> and doing nothing, lnamei() doing usual lookup, cp_old_stat() not touching
> fs code at all...
the problem was that it was calling lock_kernel(), not the lowlevel fs i
believe - this caused contention.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Anton Blanchard
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Andreas Dilger
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... Andreas Dilger
- [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [was: spinl... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Anton Blanchard
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability p... Alexander Viro
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_bloc... Ingo Molnar
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Linus Torvalds
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Alexander Viro
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... James Lewis Nance
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lr... Alexander Viro

