On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > (about lstat(): IMO lstat() should not call into the lowlevel FS code.) > > a) revalidation on network filesystems > b) just about anything layered would win from ability to replace the > normal stat() behaviour (think of UI/GID replacement, etc.) sorry, i meant ext2fs - but this was fixed by your VFS scalability changes already :-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Anton Blanchard
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Andreas Dilger
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... Andreas Dilger
- [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [was: spinl... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Anton Blanchard
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch [wa... Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability patch... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalability p... Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] pagecache SMP-scalabil... Ingo Molnar
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_lock Linus Torvalds
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_list_l... Alexander Viro
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lru_li... James Lewis Nance
- Re: spinlock usage - ext2_get_block, lr... Alexander Viro