On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, again.
> 
> Can you please test whether the following patch makes any difference?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 042d221..26368ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1477,7 +1477,10 @@ bool mod_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct 
> workqueue_struct *wq,
>       } while (unlikely(ret == -EAGAIN));
>  
>       if (likely(ret >= 0)) {
> -             __queue_delayed_work(cpu, wq, dwork, delay);
> +             if (!delay)
> +                     __queue_work(cpu, wq, &dwork->work);
> +             else
> +                     __queue_delayed_work(cpu, wq, dwork, delay);
>               local_irq_restore(flags);
>       }
>  

Yes.  I tested that both directly on top of the bad commit, and on 
v3.7-rc7, and it fixes the bug in both cases.

Thanks,
Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to