On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:51:38PM -0800, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > [...] > > got_no_fiq_insn also not initialized. > > It is static, so by definition it is initialized to 0. > > > I think as a whole on this issue requires additional comments from Russell > > as the author of implementation. > > > > PS: In any case, I can reproduce it and check it out if you send me a > > patchset > > to my email as an attachment. > > Sent privately.
Andrew, Arnd, just FYI, it works for Alexander. ----- Forwarded message from Alexander Shiyan <shc_w...@mail.ru> ----- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:42:50 +0400 From: Alexander Shiyan <shc_w...@mail.ru> To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.voront...@linaro.org> Subject: Re[2]: FIQ > Hello Alexander, > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:14:28PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Sorry, I lost the original message to the correct answer. > > Today I had a test of removal init_FIQ. > > The test took place on a custom board with a custom ARM CLPS711X OSS audio > > driver, which uses the FIQ interrupts. Everything works fine. > > Nice! Thanks a lot for testing! > > Can you please reply to the original thread, with the > > Tested-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_w...@mail.ru> > ? > > This will help pushing the series forward, plus will give you a credit for > your efforts. I am lost thread in my mailbox, you can just copy/paste my reply and ping for Arnd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
