From: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:04:32 +0000
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:38 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:30:44PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> >> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:24:26 -0200 >> > >> > > Hi Ben, >> > > >> > > * Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> [2012-11-14 05:39:34 +0000]: >> > > >> > >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me >> > >> know. >> > >> >> > >> ------------------ >> > >> >> > >> From: Ulisses Furquim <ulis...@profusion.mobi> >> > >> >> > >> commit f1e91e1640d808d332498a6b09b2bcd01462eff9 upstream. >> > >> >> > >> The handling of SCO audio links and the L2CAP protocol are essential to >> > >> any system with Bluetooth thus are always compiled in from now on. >> > > >> > > I wonder if this could not break any kind of script or code people have >> > > that >> > > refer directly to the sco and l2cap modules. Also I don't see this >> > > change as >> > > really necessary for 3.2. >> > >> > Agreed, I wish this had not been merged into -stable, I would have never >> > submitted a patch like this myself. >> >> This is required by: >> >> commit ff03261adc8b4bdd8291f1783c079b53a892b429 >> Author: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@openbossa.org> >> Date: Thu Aug 23 21:32:44 2012 -0300 >> >> Bluetooth: Fix sending a HCI Authorization Request over LE links >> >> commit d8343f125710fb596f7a88cd756679f14f4e77b9 upstream. >> >> which was already applied. > > So, do you think it's better to revert that in 3.2, or to go ahead with > this? I can't believe that just turning on bluetooth is going to force enable these sub-protocols too, that's simply rediculous. That change should have never gone into the tree. Do I _REALLY_ have to go back to validating all the bluetooth stuff by hand when John Linville sends me pull requests? Seriously? I thought we were beyond that kind of bullshit after the coding style fiasco. Actually I have a better idea, how about John stops pulling the bluetooth stuff into his tree, and instead the bluetooth folks have to submit their changes individually to the netdev list. I like that scheme better. Because I don't want John's wireless work held back by the garbage these bluetooth guys keep submitting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
