On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:38 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:30:44PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:24:26 -0200 > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > * Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> [2012-11-14 05:39:34 +0000]: > > > > > >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > >> know. > > >> > > >> ------------------ > > >> > > >> From: Ulisses Furquim <ulis...@profusion.mobi> > > >> > > >> commit f1e91e1640d808d332498a6b09b2bcd01462eff9 upstream. > > >> > > >> The handling of SCO audio links and the L2CAP protocol are essential to > > >> any system with Bluetooth thus are always compiled in from now on. > > > > > > I wonder if this could not break any kind of script or code people have > > > that > > > refer directly to the sco and l2cap modules. Also I don't see this change > > > as > > > really necessary for 3.2. > > > > Agreed, I wish this had not been merged into -stable, I would have never > > submitted a patch like this myself. > > This is required by: > > commit ff03261adc8b4bdd8291f1783c079b53a892b429 > Author: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@openbossa.org> > Date: Thu Aug 23 21:32:44 2012 -0300 > > Bluetooth: Fix sending a HCI Authorization Request over LE links > > commit d8343f125710fb596f7a88cd756679f14f4e77b9 upstream. > > which was already applied.
So, do you think it's better to revert that in 3.2, or to go ahead with this? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
