Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog

[Keith Owens]

On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 +0100 (CET), 
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>it sure has an alternative. The 'cpus spinning' code calls touch_nmi()
>within the busy loop, the polling code on the control CPU too. This is
>sure more robust and catches lockup bugs in kdb too ...

Works for me.  It even makes kdb simpler.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/