Hi Kent,
thanks a lot for this effort!
I really appreciate it.
> +What: /sys/class/misc/tpmX/device/active
> +Date: April 2006
> +KernelVersion: 2.6.17
> +Contact: tpmdd-de...@lists.sf.net
> +Description: The "active" property prints a '1' if the TPM chip is accepting
> + commands. An inactive TPM chip still contains all the state of
> + an active chip (Storage Root Key, NVRAM, etc), and can be
> + visible to the OS, but will not accept commands.
Hmm, I know this is a tricky one (enabled/activated).
maybe this would be better as:
- visible to the OS, but will not accept commands.
+ visible to the OS, but will only accept a restricted set of
commands.
+ See TCG specification(...) for more information.
> +What: /sys/class/misc/tpmX/device/cancel
> +Date: June 2005
> +KernelVersion: 2.6.13
> +Contact: tpmdd-de...@lists.sf.net
> +Description: The "cancel" property allows you to cancel the currently
> + pending TPM command. Echoing any value to cancel will call the
> + TPM vendor specific cancel operation.
I'd go for writing instead of echoing but this might only be bike-shedding.
- pending TPM command. Echoing any value to cancel will call the
+ pending TPM command. Writing any value to cancel will call the
The rest is great.
Reviewed-by: Peter Huewe <peter.hu...@infineon.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peter.hu...@infineon.com>
Thanks,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
