于 2012年11月01日 17:01, Eric Dumazet 写道: > Hi Chen > > Thats a good suggestion indeed. >
thank you very much for your confirmation. > Networking patches should be sent to net...@vger.kernel.org (added in > CC) I will do it. > > This list only cares about recent generic kernels, not RedHat ones. > it seems "it is not suitable to send any issues which only relative with Red Hat to linux-*@vger.kernel.org". > If you want to provide a patch, please base it on David Miller net-next > [1] tree, and make it official (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for > general advices) > ok, I will follow, thank you for your information. > By the way, the %8s should be replaced by %s, there is no need to make > /proc/net/ipv6_route 'beautiful'. In the past, it was *needed* because > each line had to be of a given length, but its not anymore the case. > > Thanks > 1) I agree with your result. 2) But for the "reason", I have my opinions: A) %.8s : for limitation of output string length. B) %8s : for width of output string length (but not limit 8). C) %8.8s: both limitation and width. 3) for rt->rt6i_dev->name: A) original %8s is not a bug for name len is more than 8 (can still be outputted correctly) B) it is only effect with name len is less than 8 (it will fill some ' ' before the name) C) this is the reason why I call it "beautiful", not a bug. > [1] : > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git;a=summary > I will reference it, thanks. -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
