於 二，2012-10-30 於 13:48 -0400，Josh Boyer 提到：
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> > Tahashi has a good idea for use strtobool to allow
> > 'secureboot_enable=yes' works. Please consider the following change.
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> > Joey Lee
> >
> > >From f6841a476f3d332fe7b04cb716e0b518cccd5055 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Lee, Chun-Yi <j...@suse.com>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:36:57 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] efi: more user-friendly secureboot_enable parameter
> >
> > From: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
> >
> > Use strtobool can allow 'secureboot_enable=yes', it's more user-friendly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <j...@suse.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/cred.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
> > index 3f5be65..70897a2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cred.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cred.c
> > @@ -633,9 +633,10 @@ void __init secureboot_enable()
> > /* Dummy Secure Boot enable option to fake out UEFI SB=1 */
> > static int __init secureboot_enable_opt(char *str)
> > {
> > - int sb_enable = !!simple_strtol(str, NULL, 0);
> > - if (sb_enable)
> > + bool sb_enable;
> > + if (!strtobool(str, &sb_enable) && sb_enable)
> > secureboot_enable();
> > +
> > return 1;
> > }
> > __setup("secureboot_enable=", secureboot_enable_opt);
>
> This seems like a good change to me. If you don't mind, I'll rework the
> existing patch to do this since it hasn't been accepted upstream yet and
> give Takashi-san and you appropriate credit in the commit log.
>
> josh
>
Thanks for your review and feel free add to your reworked patch.
Joey Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
