On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 13:51 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 07:12 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 04:00 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > With the recent commit to checkpatch.pl: > > > > > > commit 058806007450489bb8f457b275e5cb5c946320c1 > > > Author: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> > > > Date: Thu Oct 4 17:13:35 2012 -0700 > > > > > > checkpatch: check networking specific block comment style > > > > > > We are seeing false positive warnings. Here is an example of the > > > code the would generate a false warning: > > > > > > #define foo 0x0000 /* foo comment */ > > > > > > checkpatch.pl generates a warnings that the */ should be on a separate > > > line, which in this case is incorrect. > > > > Sorry 'bout that. I believe it's fixed by: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/14/267 > > > > Yes, I confirm that the patch in the link you provided solves the issue > I was seeing. Thanks, has the patch been accepted yet? I see it is not > in Dave's NET tree as of yet.
Andrew Morton generally picks up my checkpatch twiddles. It's in -next as of next-20121024. commit db64ad0e6f55197bc3794bef007a25f2db4760fb -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
