> Wish i knew, I'm praying that 2.2.19 hasn't/doesn't implement the ide patches like >2.4.x did. If so, and a major problem is found in > 2.2.18, then I have to maintain another machine running 2.2.18 to restore tapes. >Also means i'd have to stop using taper or dump, > and stick to tar only, as both want to read the tape back in at some point. 2.2 isnt likely to ever see the IDE patches as standard. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Khalid Aziz
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Mike Dresser
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-... Mike Dresser
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ... Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, w... Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, w... Khalid Aziz
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-... Mike Dresser
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Khalid Aziz
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-scsi Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ide-... Khalid Aziz
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ... Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, w... Khalid Aziz
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ... Camm Maguire
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, w... Mike Dresser
- Re: 2.2.18 IDE tape problem, with ... Camm Maguire