On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:41:15PM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote: > I'd rather see us just track the state and do the right thing > here. If we don't get invalid postinit if we call tpm_startup during > tpm_tis_init/tpm_tis_i2c_init, then set a flag we switch on here.
At least on my platform it is possible for tpm_tis_init to skip the TPM_STARTUP path I added if kexec has been used, so it is not a reliable indicator that the platform does/does not support the TPM. Directly checking if the TPM has been started on resume seems fool proof to me? Jasson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
