On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >Hi Ben, > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >>>2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > >>>me know. > > >>[...] > > >> > > >>No objection, but please remove the '2.6.32.x: ' prefix from the subject > > >>before committing this and the other ntp/timekeeping/hrtimer fixes. > > >Good point. Initially John used this as a differenciator when sending to > > >stable@ but I directly applied the mbox without fixing the subject, which > > >isn't a good thing. > > Do let me know if there's a better way for me to send them (and keep > > the versions straight) without creating more work for you. > > I can't speak for Willy but I would prefer something like > '[PATCH 3.2.y]' in the subject. 'git am' or any other patch > import script should strip that out.
I didn't think about this, it's another possibility indeed. Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
