On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >Hi Ben, > > > >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >>>2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > >>>me know. > >>[...] > >> > >>No objection, but please remove the '2.6.32.x: ' prefix from the subject > >>before committing this and the other ntp/timekeeping/hrtimer fixes. > >Good point. Initially John used this as a differenciator when sending to > >stable@ but I directly applied the mbox without fixing the subject, which > >isn't a good thing. > Do let me know if there's a better way for me to send them (and keep the > versions straight) without creating more work for you.
No, that was perfect, John, it was the easiest way to spot them, it's just that I need not to forget to apply sed on $subject :-) I could do that for all patches BTW. Thanks, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
