Re: 2.4.2-ac3: loop threads in D state

[Jens Axboe]

On Sun, Feb 25 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Let me elaborate: the race is very narrow and takes deliberate efforts to
> hit. It _can_ be triggered, unfortunately. This extra up() will mess your
> life later on.

What's the worst that can happen? We do an extra up, but loop_thread
will still quit once we hit zero lo_pending. And loop_clr_fd
is still protected by lo_ctl_mutex.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/