On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:09:28AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > but how does that affect pgbench and ilk that must spread regardless > > of footprints. > > Well, how do you measure latency of the 1 process in the 1:N case? Maybe > pipeline stalls of the 1 along with some way to recognize it is the 1 in > the 1:N case.
Best is to let userland tell us it's critical. Smarts are expensive. A class of it's own (my wakees do _not_ preempt me, and I don't care that you think this is unfair to the unwashed masses who will otherwise _starve_ without me feeding them) makes sense for these guys. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
